Showing posts with label Memphis animal control. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Memphis animal control. Show all posts

Friday, May 20, 2011

The Memphis Vortex

God Hates The South
If you've been following the news much this spring then you probably know that God hates the South. I don't know what we've done to incur the wrath of the Almighty, but He's been showing some pretty unmistakable signs that He is not happy with those of us who live below the Mason-Dixon line. I say this because something like 170 tornadoes cut loose across the South on one day in April, killing over 300 people. Seven people died here in my county. As if that weren't enough, it's been followed by the worst flooding of the Mississippi River in at least 70 years, and in some places, ever. (Of course, the Mississippi does span more than just the South, so we will share our misery with some of our Midwestern friends.) And, to add insult to injury, the 13-year cicadas are coming out, like some kind of plague on the land.

So, you can see why I say that God doesn't seem to like us much right now.

Memphis Animal Shelter
In the midst of all these disasters, you may have missed some of the pet stories coming out of Memphis but there have been some whoppers. By far the biggest story is that of the Memphis Animal Shelter which is being reported daily by the YesBiscuit blog. If you're not familiar with the story then I encourage you to visit the YesBiscuit site right away and catch up. YesBiscuit is on a much-needed crusade to draw attention to some of the practices at the Memphis Animal Shelter, including their high euthanasia rate, way of treating the animals in their care, minimal work with rescues and efforts to get animals adopted, among other problems at the shelter. To say that the shelter director and city officials have been dismissive is putting it mildly. So please do check out YesBiscuit's blog and try to get involved.

Dog Relocation Program?
But there's other news from Memphis, some good and some not so good. Animal rescue groups have converged on the city to try to help owners and their animals affected by the flooding. Sounds great, right? And we're sure that most of these efforts are good-hearted and well-intentioned. We applaud all of the rescuers who are reaching out to help animal owners and their animals. Except, there are a few groups who may not have good intentions. There always seem to be one or two bad apples who can spoil the whole barrel.

ASPCA is on the ground in Memphis offering shelter for pets who have been displaced by flooding. According to news articles, they say that the owners will be able to pick them up when they're ready to go home again.

"People can bring their pets here regardless of their health or situation," said Joel Lopez, a former pacemaker sales representative from New York, who quit to work for the American Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals.

The shelter is operated with staff from the organizations and volunteers who use vacation days from jobs.

"This is the largest emergency-relief deployment in our history, dating back to 2007 when the program was launched," said Steve Pawlowski, communications manager for PetSmart Charities, which is using Memphis as a staging area for the flood disaster and for victims of the recent string of tornadoes.

The New York-based ASPCA is overseeing the operation.

The process for sheltering and rescuing the animals was born from the chaos of Hurricane Katrina in 2005 when people were forced to abandon pets, many of which drowned.

It inspired rescue groups and the federal government to develop a plan that addressed animal welfare.

"We realized organizations needed to come together to create a unified operation, said Kathryn Destreza, ASPCA Southeast regional director. "There were so many lessons from Katrina. There wasn't even a people plan in place to deal with victims. Remember the Superdome? You can't imagine the chaos dealing with pets."

A federal law, created in 2006, requires states seeking Federal Emergency Management Agency assistance to accommodate pets and service animals in plans for evacuating residents facing disasters.

Rescue organizations formed the National Animal Rescue and Sheltering Coalition to create a unified effort.

"We're all pet people so we believe the least we can do is help relieve people who are under so much stress to know that their babies are safe here with us," said Debrah Schnackenberg, American Humane Association senior vice president for emergency services.

"We spoil them and treat them like they're our own until the owners are ready to reclaim them."


That sounds great, right? But what about this news release from the ASPCA that says they have formed a "national relocation program" for shelter animals?

Press Release

ASPCA Launches National Relocation Program for Shelter Animals

“Animal Relocation Initiative” Begins with Transport of Dogs, Cats from Regions Affected by Floods, Tornados

May 10,2011

ASPCA Media Contact

NEW YORK—The ASPCA® (The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals®) today announced the launch of its national Animal Relocation Initiative for shelter animals, which began with 46 dogs from shelters in eastern Arkansas that traveled westward over the weekend to make room for animals displaced by recent flooding, and continued on Monday with over 70 additional dogs from tornado-affected areas in Georgia and South Carolina going to shelters in the northeast. This morning, 15 dogs and 10 cats from shelters in a flood-affected region of Mississippi were loaded onto a trailer headed for West Palm Beach, Fla., and additional relocation efforts for animals in other affected areas are in the works.

The dogs and cats will be made available for adoption following their arrivals at the various destination shelters. Dogs from the initial relocation efforts traveled from Eastern Arkansas to shelters in Kansas and Colorado, and those from Georgia and South Carolina were sent to shelters in New York and New Jersey. The animals are being transported in climate controlled vehicles.

“Our new Animal Relocation Initiative will establish a national network that facilitates the transfer of animals and build a professional collective engaged in the issue of relocation,” said Ed Sayres, president and CEO of the ASPCA. “We also intend to develop flexible, scalable relocation programs that assure animals are moving the shortest distance possible.”

The ASPCA’s Animal Relocation Initiative moves animals from areas of oversupply to areas where there are few, if any, similar pets available in shelters for adoption. In these first cases, the ASPCA’s Field Investigation and Response Team has been deployed to areas where a large-scale disaster recovery effort is in progress, and the Animal Relocation Initiative is supporting those efforts, working with a network of agencies willing to receive and house animals that already exist in the community’s sheltering system.

“Our new program is all about supply and demand,” said Sandy Monterose, the ASPCA’s senior director of community outreach. “We will be exporting animals—safely, efficiently and humanely—from crowded shelters to regions where space is available. In this case, moving current shelter animals out of the affected area increases the ability of local organizations to help animals that need to be rescued or sheltered until they can be reunited with their families.

So, that seems a little confusing. Not to mention a trifle opportunistic. They are taking dogs in the tornado and flood areas and sending them to places where there is a demand for them. But, how do they know that some of the animals in the shelters weren't lost in the tornadoes and flooding? How do they know there aren't families looking for those dogs? And, if those dogs are sent to states 1000 miles away, how will their families ever find them? They won't even know where to look for them. Plus, the animals will have been adopted by other people. This sort of sounds like what happened with the Katrina dogs that HSUS "rescued" in Louisiana. There were all kinds of accusations at that time that HSUS took the dogs, saying that they would reunite them with their owners later, and then they sent the dogs to other states, adopted them out to other people, and their original owners couldn't find them. A few owners did track down their dogs and they had to go to court to get their dogs back.


(Gee, reading these Katrina stories, you think it's possible that HSUS doesn't really have much hands-on experience with animal care? Hmmm? What do you think? But how could that possibly be true? Isn't it HSUS that is always proposing legislation about animal care and telling people how to take care of animals? How odd. Aren't they the recognized "experts" when it comes to animals? Well, maybe not.)


So, you see why I think it's a little odd for the ASPCA to be "relocating" these dogs that they are "rescuing." They are kind of rescuing and relocating them against their will, or at least under false pretenses. And they aren't the only group going into tornado and flood areas in the South and plucking dogs out of shelters and even out of people's yards and sending them north and elsewhere. It's kind of despicable, but there are a lot of shelters in the north and other places which are taking these dogs and then adopting/selling them, using the big selling point that they are "Tornado Dogs!" to get people to pay money for them. Again, their families don't have any idea what has happened to these dogs. And shelters are making money off them. It's a pretty rotten business. It stinks.


Actually this "relocation" business raises another troubling question. If dogs from southern disaster areas are being moved to shelters in other parts of the country, what happens to the dogs in those shelters? Are they being killed to make room for the more financially desirable "Tornado Dogs!"? Sure, those shelters may be less crowded, but they probably aren't completely empty. Who wants to buy a plain old local dog when a shelter can pimp a dog with a sad story that's been through a flood? I just wonder how many dogs are being killed as part of this "dog relocation program"?


Trunking?

Oh, yeah, there's one more story from Memphis that I wanted to mention. This one pops up every year or two and it always makes me roll my eyes. Ever hear of "trunking"? Well, don't feel bad. Most people haven't. That's probably because it comes from the tortured and alarmist brains of some animal rights people and doesn't really exist except in their fantasies. The story always comes from the same newspaper in Memphis and cites the same two women as sources. According to these people "trunking" is the new craze in dog fighting whereby dogs are thrown into the trunk of some ne'er-do-well's car and, while this person drives around playing loud music, the dogs fight in the trunk ... er, yeah. I'm not making this up. It's a sport or activity without any spectators which really makes no sense to me. And, no one has ever actually seen this event happen. Nor is there any evidence that this event has ever happened. But these ladies claim that this is the hot new trend in dog fighting. Yeah, sure. So, again, no witnesses, no evidence, no one has ever seen it happen. But the story gets reported periodically. I really think this is some kind of urban legend perpetuated by a couple of animal rights fanatics. Seriously, if you google the term "trunking" the only stories relating to dog fighting (and there are hardly any at all) go right back to these two women in Memphis. I really think they made it up and I feel kind of sorry for them if that's the way their minds work.


So, if you're in Memphis, being chased by a tornado, and the river is rising to meet you, watch out for someone in a car with loud music playing because he could have dogs fighting in the trunk. Okay? Just be careful out there. Memphis is really in trouble.


Thursday, January 13, 2011

Memphis Woman Commits Suicide After Pets Were Taken Away


Memphis Woman Commits Suicide After Pets Were Taken Away


Published: 1/11 6:42 pm

Updated: 3:04 pm


MEMPHIS, TN-- A man said a bad decision by an animal control officer made his wife commit suicide. The officer took away all of the woman’s pets and according to her husband, her will to live.


“I am angry at the city, very angry. There was no reason to do what they did,” said Jay Morgan about his wife Tommie, “they just pushed her over the edge.”


Animal control officers went to the house on a report of loose dogs. When they left, they took all eleven of the family’s cats and dogs.


“They were her babies. They were her life. She treated them like children,” said Morgan.


The question is why did the animal control worker take all of the dogs?


“The dogs were fine. The house reeked but the dogs were fine,” said Morgan.


Tommie Morgan was given a ticket for having a dog at large, no dog license and failing to spay or neuter the animals.


Four days after the animals were removed from the house, Jay Morgan said, “It destroyed her. She killed herself.”


A week later the animal control officer was back at the Morgan house, saying it was a follow up visit. Sources tell abc24.com it was really an attempt to fix botched paperwork. Since Tommy Morgan was dead, the officer charged her husband with a long list of charges including animal cruelty.


“There was nothing wrong with anyone of those dogs,” said Morgan.

Morgan said the officer forged the date on the new charges, which made it look like the new ticket was issued before the wife died.


“She wrote the wrong date on it. She came after my wife passed away,” said Morgan.


Morgan said he can’t get his wife back, but plans to fight and hold the city accountable for her death, “I am not letting them get away with this.”


abc24.com wanted to see the animals for ourselves, but as of Tuesday, no one from city hall granted permission. We also wanted to ask the shelter director what happened, but still no response from city hall on that.


A statement from the mayor’s office said the officer was at the house when she noticed the conditions of the animals and a strong smell of ammonia in the house. It also offers sympathy to the family for the loss of their loved one.

Sunday, August 22, 2010

SAOVA Letter Regarding Proposed Memphis Dog Ordinance

Sportsmen’s & Animal Owners’ Voting Alliance
Carlotta Cooper, Tennessee Director
address
address


August 22, 2010

Memphis Public Services & Neighborhood Committee Members
and Memphis City Council Members
125 N. Main
Room 514
Memphis, TN 38103

Dear Committee and Council Members:

I’m writing to you on behalf of the Sportsmen’s & Animal Owners’ Voting Alliance (SAOVA), a national organization that represents the interests of hunters, sportsmen and pet owners, in opposition to the publicized spay neuter ordinance that you are said to be considering for Memphis. We have numerous supporters in the Memphis area and we strongly believe that this ordinance would be harmful to all dogs and dog owners.

By imposing a 29-pound weight limit and requiring dogs weighing 30 pounds or more to be spayed and neutered, eight of the top 10 breeds registered by the American Kennel Club would have to be spayed and neutered in your city. These breeds include such family favorites and hunting dogs as Golden Retrievers, Labrador Retrievers and Beagles.

Mandatory spay neuter laws have been tried in many places in the last couple of decades and they have failed everywhere they have been tried. One notable place they have failed has been Asheville, NC. Although Asheville was initially held up as an example of success, the city and Buncombe County no longer release their shelter intake numbers. The last numbers they reported several years ago showed that, after implementing mandatory spay neutering, they only took 15 fewer dogs into their shelters than the year before, when there was no MSN.

The fact is that when mandatory spay neutering is implemented people stop following ALL local dog ordinances because they are afraid they will be turned in for not having their dogs spayed or neutered. This means that dogs go unvaccinated and unlicensed. Unvaccinated dogs represent a public health risk. Cities lose money for needed animal control services.

If mandatory spay neutering is enforced, many people will surrender their dogs to the shelters or turn them loose because they simply cannot afford to have their dogs spayed and neutered. This means more dogs in shelters and more dogs euthanized. The number of dogs killed in Memphis would escalate. Is that really what you want in your city?

SAOVA suggests stronger enforcement of existing leash laws. We understand that animal control in Memphis may be understaffed but instituting mandatory spay neutering will only create an additional burden on your animal control staff if they must try to police the reproductive status of people’s pets.

We would also like to point out that mandatory spaying and neutering of dogs over 29 pounds is unfair to sportsmen who hunt with their dogs. Virtually all breeds of hunting dogs weigh over 29 pounds. There are many clubs for sportsmen in Shelby County, as well as individual hunters. They live in your districts. Sportsmen use dogs for hunting or retrieving fox, raccoons, birds, and waterfowl, to name a few. Hunting dogs from all over the United States compete each year in the National Bird Dog Championship just outside Memphis. These hunters support the state by purchasing hunting licenses and hunters spend billions of dollars annually on equipment. These hunters do NOT want to pay a $200 fee to keep their dogs intact. Hunters have protested attempts to impose mandatory spay neuter laws wherever they have been proposed throughout the state. There is currently no city or town in Tennessee with a mandatory spay neutering ordinance.

Trying to fund animal control by means of $200 fertile animal permits is a very shortsighted policy. There is a large amount of material that shows that spaying and neutering pets, particularly at a young age, can cause health problems to dogs. Owners should have the right, without prejudice, to keep their pets intact. Decisions to spay or neuter should be made by an owner in consultation with their veterinarian. These are health decisions for the pet.



Virtually every major animal organization now opposes mandatory spaying and neutering, including the following:

American Dog Owners’ Association:

Alley Cat Allies:

American College of Theriogenologists and The Society for Theriogenology:

International Association of Canine Professionals:

American Herding Breed Association:

National Association of Dog Obedience Instructors, Inc.

The American Veterinary Medical Association:

and

ASPCA

A $200 fertile animal permit also punishes good breeders. These are the people who belong to kennel clubs, offer dog training, and rescue and foster dogs. You need these people in your community. Instead of punishing them by trying to create an exorbitant permit fee you should be trying to work with them to find good solutions. They are the people with the most knowledge about dogs in your community. They are not the problem. They are your greatest resource.

We hope that you will reconsider and find a better solution for the animal control issues in Memphis. Voluntary spay neuter programs have been very successful in many areas. There are many grant programs and organizations that provide funding for communities in need. These programs have been proven to work much better than mandatory spay neuter programs.

If I can be of any assistance please don’t hesitate to let me know.

Sincerely,
Carlotta Cooper

Monday, August 16, 2010

Memphis Needs Your Help

Subject: Fwd:AKC Legislative Alert: MEMPHIS MSN Ordinance

Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 08:37:06 -0500

From: chrotts@vci.net



Memphis needs our help. Please read the AKC alert below & take a moment

to write your opposition to all of the councilmen. Our fellow dog

breeders & owners in Memphis need our help in killing this terrible

ordinance.


The committee voted on Tues. to send the proposed ordinance to the full

council for a vote, the first of which will be in two weeks. Before it

becomes law, it must go for 3 votes (readings)


I will be attending the Memphis show (Southaven) next Saturday, Aug

21 (on behalf of ARC) & assisting The Responsible Animal Owners of TN

in getting the word out & gathering more opposition. (The RAOT is

the AKC federation for the state of TN)


AFter speaking at length yesterday with Donna Malone (RAOT), she has

asked me to pass along to all breeders, exhibitors & kennel clubs to GET

INVOLVED. Last year the ARs tried to pass similar legislation in

Jackson & Johnson City; both failed due to the combined efforts of

many, many exhibitors & clubs (both local & out of state).


The population of Memphis (Shelby CO.) is around 600,000. When you

consider the number of animal control officers employed to enforce their

existing law (which is a good one), the number of shifts each officer

has per week, the average comes out to 1.91 officers per shift for a

population of that size! It is clear that enforcement of existing

law is sorely needed, as well as more officers to carry it out.


Earlier this year (March), Councilman Shea Flinn proposed MSN for "pit

bull" type dogs, which was dropped. The precipitating event for the

current proposal arose after a elderly man was attacked & later died due

to 2 dogs running at large. Animal control had been alerted the day

before this tragedy that the dogs were loose, but they took NO

ACTION. This man would still be alive had animal control done its

job & enforced the existing law.


If you will be attending the shows next weekend & would be willing to

HELP, please email me privately. Donna & I won't have trouble finding a

job for you:-)))


In the meantime, please consider that these folks in Memphis are our

"neighbors in dogs"...the ARs have set their sights on this city today.

Tomorrow, it could very well be us. Think about how many people you

know that live in the Memphis area...have you sold any dogs to folks

that live there? Do you know fellow exhibitors that live there?

Please write & oppose this ordinance.


(permission to forward this message in its entirety)



Robin Cannon,

Member, American Rottweiler Club Legislative Committee

AKC Legislative Liaison, Paducah Kennel Club, German Shepherd Dog

Club of West KY, Australian Cattle Dog Club of West Ky

***********************************************************************



Memphis to Consider Mandatory Spay/Neuter, New Dangerous Dog

Definitions & Fee Increases on August 10th

Print This Article

[Friday, August 06, 2010]


The Memphis City Council Services & Neighborhood Committee will

consider four ordinances amending the city’s animal control laws on

Tuesday, August 10th. The proposal will require mandatory spay/neuter

of all dogs over 29 pounds, define any dog that has "bitten once and

been at-large twice" as a dangerous dog, increase fees for owners of

intact dogs and limit tethering. It is vital that responsible dog

owners and breeders attend this meeting to oppose these changes.


Memphis City Council Public Services & Neighborhood Committee Meeting

Tuesday, August 10th

10:15am

City Council Conference Room

5th floor of City Hall

125 N. Main

Memphis, TN 38103


Provisions of the Ordinances


* Require dogs over 29 pounds to be spayed/neutered

o Exemptions

+ Dogs trained and used as law enforcement dogs.

+ Dogs trained and used as a guide dog, hearing dog,

assistance dog, therapy dog, seizure alert dog or designated as

breeding stock by an agency approved by the director.

+ Dogs trained and used as search and rescue dogs or

designated as breeding stock by an agency approved by the director.

+ Dogs trained and used as herding or livestock

guardian dogs, or designated as breeding stock by an agency approved

by the director.

+ Dogs unable to be sterilized for a medical reason.

+ Dogs boarded in a licensed kennel.

+ Dogs registered with AKC or other recognized

registry or trained and kept for the purpose of show, field or

agility trials. However, these owners must comply with the following:

# Must apply for a Fertile Animal Permit

# Must purchase a one-time $200 intact animal

permit (It is not truly an exemption if you have to buy an expensive

license).

# Owners are allowed only one litter per

residence per 12-months.

* Defines dogs that have "bitten once and been at-large twice"

as dangerous dogs, but does not define "bitten." Does this mean

bitten a person and inflicted injury? Bitten another domestic animal?

What if the bite does not cause injury or is provoked?

* Requires a dog that has bitten or attacked to be sterilized.

o Again, it is not clear what would happen if the bite was

provoked or if there was no injury resulting from the bite. If the

intent is to require sterilization of dogs that have been adjudicated

to be dangerous or vicious, then that should be specified.

* Sets the license fee for intact dogs weighing 29 pounds or

less at $35 annually and removes the license fee and requirement for

sterilized dogs.

+ It is unreasonable for intact animal owners to be

solely responsible for funding animal control operations. Licensing

was originally established to ensure that dogs were vaccinated for

rabies – this will significantly undermine that goal if the majority

of dogs no longer need to be licensed. If this ordinance is adopted,

it becomes solely a tax on owners of intact dogs. Additionally, one

wonders why intact dogs weighing less than 29 pounds are licensed

annually and intact dogs weighing more than 29 pounds are offered a

lifetime license.

* Requires that dogs restrained by tie-outs or overhead cable

runs also be restrained by a traditional or invisible fence. This

will mean that many owners will have to construct a traditional fence

or install an invisible fence; likely costing thousands of dollars.

* Requires that dogs restrained by tie-outs or overhead cable

runs for more than 2 hours be sterilized.


What You Can Do


* Attend the Memphis City Council Public Services & Neighborhood

Committee meeting on August 10th to oppose the ordinance. Our AKC

Federation, The Responsible Animal Owners of Tennessee will be

coordinating speakers and can be reached at raotinc@aol.com.


*


Write a letter, email, or call the city council members and

ask them to oppose the ordinance.


Mailing Address

125 N. Main, Room 514

Memphis, TN 38103


Public Services & Neighborhood Committee Members


District 7 - Barbara Swearengen Ware (Chair)

(901) 458-9406

Swearengen.Ware@memphistn.gov


District 2 - William C. Boyd (Vice-Chair)

(901) 576-6786

Bill.Boyd@memphistn.gov


Super District 8 - Myron Lowery

(901) 576-7012

Myron.Lowery@memphistn.gov


Super District 9 - Kemp Conrad

Office (901) 576-6786

Kemp.Conrad@memphistn.gov


Super District 9 - Shea Flinn

(901) 576-6786

Shea.Flinn@memphistn.gov


Super District 9 - Reid Hedgepeth

(901) 576-6786

Reid.Hedgepeth@memphistn.gov


City Council Members


District 1- Bill Morrison

(901) 576-6786

Bill.Morrison@memphistn.gov


District 3 - Harold Collins

(901) 576-6786

Harold.Collins@memphistn.gov


District 4 - Wanda Halbert

(901) 576-6786

Wanda.Halbert@memphistn.gov


District 5 - Jim Strickland

(901) 576-6786

Jim.Strickland@memphistn.gov


District 6 - Edmund Ford Jr.

(901) 576-6786

Edmund.Fordjr@memphistn.gov


Super District 8 - Joe Brown

(901) 274-4724

Joe.Brown@memphistn.gov


Super District 8 - Janis Fullilove

(901) 576-6786

Janis.Fullilove@memphistn.gov