Friday, June 22, 2012

No More Air Swimming For Pepper

Here's a story that caught my eye recently. Apparently it caught the eye of a lot of people in Tennessee because I keep getting Google Alerts about it in my inbox whenever it reappears in the news.

Tennessee lawmaker defends holding dog out window of moving car


Published June 19th, 2012 2:32 pm

Image

Rep. Julia Hurley


NASHVILLE, Tenn. (AP) — A state lawmaker is hitting back at critics of a YouTube video she posted of her dog being held out of the window of a moving car.

Freshman Rep. Julia Hurley said in a Tuesday interview in her legislative office in Nashville that her Chinese crested named Pepper enjoys being held out into the wind.

The Lenoir City Republican said people who complained about the video should explain why they don't have a similar reaction about other unrestrained dogs in the beds of pickup trucks or leaning out windows.

The Knoxville News Sentinel reported that Hurley's brief video titled "Pepper Air Swims" was pulled from YouTube after two days. Hurley said Tuesday she removed the video because she "didn't want to deal with" criticism she calls politically motivated.

Now, as a long-time pet owner and as someone who writes about pet care for a living, I can tell you that you  should not hold a dog out the window of a moving car. Your dog can get a painful eye injury from grit or debris; you could drop him; he could be hit by something outside the window, and so on. It's just not a good idea.

Letting your dog stick his head out the window of a moving vehicle is only slightly better. It has the same risks, though at least the dog is standing and can pull back. Letting your dog ride unrestrained in the bed of a pickup truck also has dangers. If you are driving or riding with your dog in the back of a truck, it's best to have your dog on a leash so he can't fall out.

With all that said, I think people have really beaten up on Representative Hurley too much. She posted a video of her dog doing something that she obviously feels the dog enjoys. She wouldn't put a video on YouTube unless she thought her dog was having a good time. She had no idea that people would react badly to the video.

To be honest, people do things with their pets all the time that are questionable or that other people might not like. I'm not saying you should hold your dog out the window of a moving car, but I am saying that I see people doing things with their dogs that I, as someone who has been breeding and raising dogs for 25 years, wouldn't do. When I'm in the grocery store I see people buying dog food and I could go up to them and say, "Hey, you don't want to buy that food." Or they might be using a flea and tick product that I know won't work. I hear people discussing products for their dogs and I don't butt in and tell them they're going to dry out their dog's skin and ruin his coat. I write my articles online and in magazines. Information is available for pet owners who want it. But plenty of pet owners do things all the time that are not really good for their dogs. Many of the people criticizing Rep. Hurley might be doing things with their own dogs that aren't really that wise.

So, maybe people should lay off Rep. Hurley because she was doing something fun with Pepper. It was an honest mistake. Anyone who owns a dog makes lots of mistakes through the years. I personally turned a dog blue and green once when I used Mrs. Stewart's Old Fashioned Blueing on him after a bath to try to make him look whiter. He looked like a pastel Easter egg for a couple of weeks. But there was no harm done and the colors eventually washed out. I never tried that again.

At the very least, it's nice to know we have legislators who are dog lovers.

Thursday, June 14, 2012

Join With the AKC to Protect Responsible Small Breeders

Join With the AKC to Protect Responsible Small Breeders

The American Kennel Club has created the Join With the AKC to Protect Responsible Small Breeders petition in response to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) new proposed regulations which would create harsh and unintended consequences for responsible small and hobby breeders in this country.
Please join us by signing the Join With the AKC to Protect Responsible Small Breeders petition before July 16 when the public comment period to the Animal Care Division of the USDA’s Animal Plant and Health Inspection Service ends. The petition, along with AKC’s comments on the proposed rule change, will be sent to the USDA.
Join With the AKC to Protect Responsible Small Breeders — Petition
We join with the American Kennel Club to express our concerns about the harsh and unintended consequences that the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s proposed regulations (RIN 0578-AD57) to redefine “retail pet store” would have on responsible small and hobby breeders.  Currently, responsible small and hobby breeders across this country provide Americans with healthy, well-socialized, loving family companions.
Under the proposed regulations, breeders or others who sell a puppy sight unseen, by any means including online, by mail or by telephone, would now be regulated in accordance with USDA standards, if you own more than four "breeding females" of any of the listed species, including dogs and cats. The effect of these proposed regulations would be to take away the public’s opportunity to obtain puppies from those breeders, who in many cases have dedicated their lives to breeding for health, breed type and temperament.
As the leader and expert in breeding and maintaining dogs for more than a century, the AKC supports responsible breeders and dog owners through its educational and inspections programs. As the only purebred dog registry with a care and conditions of dogs policy – which we have recently enhanced to create a comprehensive policy for the welfare of all dogs – more than 55,000 inspections have been conducted since 2000. We know through experience that regardless of the number of dogs owned or the manner in which breeders interact with potential puppy buyers, a “one size fits all” breeder regulation is unfair and unenforceable.
We sign this petition in order to alert the USDA that a “one size fits all breeders” type of regulation is not in the best interest of dogs and/or consumers in this country. We stand in support of the AKC’s comments to the USDA in opposition to the proposed regulations as written.  In so doing, we demonstrate our commitment to the continued breeding of dogs by responsible small and hobby breeders throughout this country.

Wednesday, June 13, 2012

Will The APHIS Rule Changes Affect YOU?



Proposed APHIS Rule Changes Will Affect Hobby Breeders

This article originally appeared in  the May 25, 2012 issue of Dog News and is reposted here by permission of the author.

Proposed APHIS Rule Changes Will Affect Hobby Breeders
Carlotta Cooper

On May 10, 2012, APHIS (Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service), part of the United States Department of Agriculture, held a conference call with stakeholders to announce new regulations that they planned to add to the Animal Welfare Act which covers how animals are bred and kept in the United States. The regulations apply to people who breed dogs, cats, rabbits, and other pets and domestic animals.

You can listen to the conference call here, Or you can read the transcript of the conference call here.

In order to understand the proposed new regulations you need to be aware of the fact that hobby dog breeders (and other small breeders of pets) have long been considered in the same category as “retail pet stores.” This is because we sell directly to the public at retail, instead of selling puppies wholesale. The idea with a “retail pet store” is that you don't have to be inspected by APHIS because your buyers have the opportunity to inspect you. If things were not in good shape where you have your puppies and dogs, your buyers would report you. For USDA inspection purposes, this means that we have not had to be inspected by APHIS. The same is true of retail pet stores. You should also know that rescue organizations have also been considered in this same “retail pet store” exemption category because they sell their puppies and dogs one at a time, on a retail basis, and not wholesale. However, the new regulations proposed by APHIS would remove this exemption from hobby breeders and rescues.

Background
If you are wondering what prompted these proposed new regulations, or if APHIS has the authority to make these rules, here is a little background.

In the 1960s Congress passed the Animal Welfare Act. It was originally set up to ensure better care for animals in laboratories but it was later expanded to provide better care for dogs in large breeding facilities. Under this act the USDA and APHIS have regulatory authority to make rules regarding the care of animals. When they change the rules they do not have to go back to Congress or the president for approval. When there is a proposed rule change, the new rules are posted for public comment and, after consideration, the rules are changed, accepted, or in some cases dropped.

HSUS and other animal rights groups have been pushing to expand regulation to include hobby breeders for 15 years. The Doris Day Animal League (DDAL) and PETA pushed for changes in the rules in 1997. DDAL sued the USDA to force them to license and inspect hobby breeders. The lawsuit continued for several years and the USDA eventually prevailed, leaving the “retail pet store” exemption intact. There were also legislative attempts to create laws that would have included hobby breeders in inspections: the Puppy Protection Acts of 2001 and 2003, PAWS in 2005, a Senate Amendment as a rider to the Farm Bill in 2007, “Baby's Bill” in 2008, and PUPS in 2010 and 2011.

Now the USDA and APHIS, following an Office of the Inspector General's report in 2010 that showed they were not adequately inspecting wholesale commercial dog breeders, have come back with proposed rules that will not significantly affect wholesale breeders. One of the recommendations in the OIG report was to look at people who sell large numbers of puppies online, or “Internet sellers.” These sellers often do sell puppies without a buyer visiting their premises. However, there is scant evidence that this is a huge problem or that large numbers of buyers are dissatisfied with their purchases. In fact, one of the problems with the proposed new rules from APHIS is that they have done little or no research about the problems they claim they are trying to fix. They have not identified how many new pet owners actually have any complaints about dog breeders or other information they would need to know before coming up with new rules.

The Proposed Rules
You should know that the proposed rules will affect anyone who sells any dog or cat during the course of a year. They will also affect other species such as rabbits, guinea pigs, hamsters, gerbils, domestic ferrets, and others for use as pets. Dog breeders currently don't have to have kennels that are Animal Welfare Act-compliant: with waterproof surfaces, separate food preparation areas, floor drains, and always being available for inspection. And we are not fined by APHIS if we have too many issues.

However, if the proposed rules are adopted, there will be new requirements in order to be a “retail pet store” if you are a hobby breeder or rescue:

1. You will have to have every single one of your puppy buyers physically enter your home (which is considered to be your “store”). They have to physically visit your premises at least once for each sale. You cannot ship dogs, meet buyers at shows or rest areas, or at a McDonald's to deliver a puppy unless that buyer has already come to your home at another time *for that same sale*. In this case there are no restrictions on the numbers of dogs (or cats, etc.) that you can keep.

This may be the most practical way to handle the proposed rules for most hobby breeders in order to comply but it certainly won't be easy for you OR for your buyers. If you are caught selling even ONE dog without the buyer coming to your home, you would lose your exemption and have to become USDA-licensed and subject to inspections. If you have a breeder friend across the country and you often swap puppies, you will have to physically visit their home for each puppy you buy. It doesn't matter that you have known each other or co-bred litters together for 20 years. There must be a new visit for each puppy purchased.

OR

2. You can keep four or fewer breedable females (APHIS currently has no definition for “breedable females”) and sell only the offspring of your own females raised on your premises. If you choose this option you can ship dogs, meet people at rest areas so they can pick up a puppy, and so on. However, the four or fewer breedable females you own does include bitches co-owned with others, as the rules are understood at this time.

Breedable Females
As mentioned, APHIS currently has no definition for “breedable female.” In the May 10 conference call this issue was raised and APHIS officials said it would have to be addressed. They urged people to comment on the matter (along with many, many other issues that were raised). It seems likely that a breedable female will be considered a bitch that is intact and over four (or possibly six) months of age. It is not known if there will be an upper age limit. You will probably have to provide paperwork to prove a bitch has been spayed.

It does not matter if you do not intend to breed a bitch, or if you help rescue and you do not breed that particular breed, or if you are keeping a bitch for a friend or family member, or if you are keeping a bitch for one of your puppy owners who is on vacation, or if she is at your home while you are showing her for someone else. The word used in the regulations is “maintained.” If you are feeding her, she counts and she would put you over your four bitch limit.

The proposed regulations also contain wording about bitches maintained “in concert” with other people. This is probably a reference to co-ownerships and it likely means that a co-owned breedable bitch will be counted against all owners who co-own her.


If you believe that a bitch is sterile but you have no paperwork from your veterinarian for a spay for her, she will probably be counted as a breedable bitch.

Wording in the proposed regulations also states that you can “sell only the offspring of your own females, raised on your premises.” This means that you cannot sell a stud fee puppy or any “puppies back” from a bitch you sold.

Impact
As you can tell, these proposed regulations will affect nearly every hobby breeder, whether they breed for show, performance, hunting, or to produce quality pets. If you have more than four bitches, or you ever have more than four girls on your property, as so many of us do, you will have to re-think how you manage your breeding and how you maintain your dogs. You will have to have a visit from every single buyer at some point during a sale. For some breeders, this is too dangerous. They have good reason to fear animal rights fanatics who are opposed to breeding. Others worry about their personal safety, especially if they live alone. And other breeders have legitimate concerns about allowing visitors into the house when they have younger litters.

Many breeders may decide to give up breeding altogether, or cut down to the point where they cannot breed or compete in any meaningful way. You have to imagine that the effect on AKC registrations will be very damaging. This is a body blow to dog breeding in the United States if these proposed rules are put into effect.

Enforcement
How will the proposed rules be enforced? HSUS, the ASPCA, and other animal rights groups were quick to ask this question during the conference call. APHIS said that they had a wide range of ways to enforce the rules. Some of the ways that APHIS may enforce the rules include complaints from puppy buyers, tips from animal rights zealots, and calls from other breeders and perhaps co-owners. AR-leaning vets may report a breeder. And APHIS could obtain information about who is shipping puppies from airlines. Basically, APHIS doesn't have to catch every breeder who breaks the rules. They only have to catch a few people and scare the rest into compliance.

AWA Requirements
If you have more than four bitches and you think you might prefer to become USDA-compliant, you should check out the APHIS inspection forms:

http://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_welfare/downloads/Inspection_Requirements Attachments.PDF

http://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_welfare/downloads/Inspection_Requirements

It is impossible to meet these requirements in a home setting. Dogs raised in USDA kennels have to be kept in kennel buildings.

What Can You Do?
These are *proposed rules*. They are not part of the USDA's regulations – yet. But APHIS is quite serious about putting these rules into effect. We are currently in the comment period for the rules. We have until July 16, 2012 to make comments objecting to the rules and urging APHIS to reconsider. So, here is what you can do.

1) Comment
A 60-day comment period began May 16 when the regulations were published
to the Federal Register. Go to
To read the regulations for yourself, click on the PDF icon next to VIEW DOCUMENT.
When you comment you should be respectful. Tell APHIS how the change in rules would affect you and your breeding program. Ask APHIS to withdraw the proposed regulations. These regulations are intended to regulate large Internet breeders but no studies have been done about large Internet kennels to see how many there are or find out what kind of problems there might be. The government says there have been complaints from consumers but they can't say how many complaints there have been. These proposed regulations would catch thousands of caring, devoted, ethical hobby breeders in their net and could put an end to many breeding programs. These rules would be especially harmful for rare breeds and breeds with smaller numbers.

Remember these are *proposed regulations*. They are not a law passed by Congress that has to be voted on. But they would seriously impact the nation's economy. They would also impact APHIS's budget. This is tremendous over-regulation of the worst kind and it will make it much harder to find a good dog and more expensive to buy one.

These regulations would also effect rescues. They would be subject to exactly the same rules that would harm hobby breeders. Anyone who wanted to adopt a rescue dog would have to visit the actual place where the dog was being maintained, even if that was a foster home if the rescue did not have an actual building of its own. If the rescue had more than four unspayed females in a year, they would be subject the same rules as hobby dog breeders and would need to become USDA-compliant. They would not be able to meet new owners off-premises to give them their new dog. Rescues need to comment on these proposed rules, too.

3) Send a copy of your comment to AKC at
doglaw@akc.orgdoglaw@akc.org. AKC is collecting comments and will make comments to APHIS based on what they hear from dog breeders.

It's vitally important that you comment on these proposed regulations and tell APHIS how they will affect you and your ability to produce healthy, happy dogs. This is the most serious threat to dog breeding that we have ever faced. Please comment now to stop these harmful regulations.



My thanks to Sharyn and Walt Hutchens, Margo Milde, Susan Wolf of SAOVA, and Donna Fefee who did so much of the heavy lifting to decipher these proposed regulations and make them more comprehensible to the rest of us.