Sunday, August 19, 2012

If You LIve In Tennessee, Hide Your Turtles

It's been an eventful few weeks while pet breeders and owners have been occupied with the APHIS comment period and trying to explain to the USDA why raising pets as a hobby should not require the same federal regulation as commercial breeding.  Not only has HSUS been excoriating the Tennessee Walking Horse people and offering bounties on them with the Celebration coming up in Shelbyville (more on that in another post), but it's now illegal to own a turtle in Tennessee.  Yes, you read that right.  Better hide your turtles lest the gub'mint comes to take them away from you.

Oh, it's for our own good, of course.  It always is.

The first we knew about this new edict came from an article in The Tennessean on August 7:

Turtles outlawed as pets in Tennessee because of harmful bacteria


Turtles might be cute to look at, but they also can harbor deadly bacteria, including salmonella.
For that reason, the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency will not issue permits for pet stores to sell turtles or for people to own turtles. That means it’s illegal to keep them as pets in the state — regardless of whether people find them in their front yard or bring them back as souvenirs from vacation.

As it turns out, it's been illegal to purchase those cute little slider turtles in pet shops in Tennessee for years, but now, courtesy of the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency, you can't even keep a box turtle that wanders into your yard.

And I have to ask, seriously, has anyone ever, in their wildest imaginings, ever considered getting a permit to keep a turtle?  I didn't think so.

But here's what the TWRA, an organization that I once respected because they gave me some advice about searching for and humanely trapping a missing dog, says on the subject:

Walter Cook, captive wildlife coordinator for the TWRA, says: “It’s common sense.”
“It’s a public health concern and we have to be responsible,” he says. “Being able to pull the skin and legs back into a shell creates a moist environment that aids bacteria growth. And you can’t remove animals from the wild alive because they have a purpose and provide a necessary component to the ecosystem. We don’t know what the population of these animals is or how many could be removed before jeopardizing the population.”

So, if you decipher this statement, Mr. Cook doesn't actually have any data and they haven't done any research, but, by golly, the government is going to protect something or somebody.

Seriously, he makes it sound like millions of Tennesseans are abducting turtles from the wild and I kind of doubt that's happening.  Don't get me wrong.  Turtles are nice and I had some as pets when I was a kid, but without exception, every single one of them was released back where it came from.  My brothers and I always figured out that they weren't too exciting so we let them go.

If Mr. Cook and others say turtles carry salmonella, I will accept that.  But no one I know has ever become ill from handling a turtle.  Maybe they actually washed their hands after playing with the turtle the way their parents taught them.  I know we may have more people with compromised immune systems now, but this whole idea just seems over the top.  They're turtles!  Get a grip.

I've been finding it hard to accept this change myself.  I keep wandering around the house muttering, "I can't own a turtle.  I can't own a turtle in Tennessee."  It boggles my mind.  Not that I wanted to own a turtle, but now I kind of do.  It's just one more thing the government is interfering in, it seems to me.  And it's so silly.

The TWRA says they aren't interested in prosecuting anyone.  Mr. Cook hopes people will donate their current turtles to one of Tennessee's wildlife education facilities.  That just strikes me as funny.  They should go out and get their own turtles, you know?  And turtles are so common in Tennessee who is going to want to see them at an education facility?  Do they really think people are going to surrender their turtles?  Will they have a turtle amnesty period?

Oh, they also say that turtles donated to the wildlife education facilities "will be kept in a closed habitat to reduce the risk of spreading the deadly bacteria."  According to Mr. Cook, "We just don't want anybody to get sick."  THEY'RE TURTLES!  THEY'RE FRICKING TURTLES!  Sorry, but he makes it sounds like they are aliens from another planet.  They live here.  They are a normal, natural part of life in Tennessee and most people who live in suburban and rural areas have no doubt encountered a turtle, with no harm to either side.

Mr. Cook sounds like a fruitcake, if you ask me.  I'm not sure he should be doing this job if he's so scared of animals.

The fact is, all of our pets, our kids, and just about everything around us is full of germs and deadly bacteria.  It's a normal part of life.  If your cat or dog snuggles up to you, you're taking a risk.  When your kids kiss you, you're exposed to germs.  The government cannot protect us from everything.  The more they try, the more of our freedoms they are taking away from us.  There are always people who see danger in everyday things. You can't protect people from every danger they could encounter, including bacteria from pets.

I think if you live in Tennessee and you want to have a turtle, you should go right ahead and have one.  Just wash your hands after you pet him and keep him away from people who have a compromised immune system.

The TWRA can be reached at 615-781-6500 or visit them online at www.tn.gov/twra. Send Mr. Cook some pictures of your turtles, too.  They could hold little signs that say, "Don't Tread On Me."



Saturday, August 11, 2012

The End Is Near

The APHIS comment period closes on WEDNESDAY, August 15!!!!!  If you haven't made a comment, you're running out of time.  PLEASE make your comments now!  Even if you have made comments, you still have this short amount of time to make a couple more.  Urge your friends to make comments.  Ask your puppy/kitten or other buyers to make a comment.  Tell your fellow club members to comment.  These proposed rules will affect all of us:  how we breed and keep our animals, how people buy pets, the whole future of pets, show dogs, working dogs, and other animals in this country.

If you have some question or subject in your mind, this is the last chance you'll have to tell APHIS about it, so write them!

http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=APHIS-2011-0003-0001

And, if you haven't signed AKC's petition, you only have until MONDAY, August 13 to sign it.


http://www.akc.org/petition/

Wednesday, August 8, 2012

Deception from APHIS

This article first appeared in the July 27, 2012 issue of DOG NEWS and is posted here by permission of the author.

Deception from APHIS
Carlotta Cooper

I recently had the pleasure of attending a meeting of many of the people in my state involved in dog legislation. Of course, the proposed APHIS rule changes were one of the topics. It was a very productive meeting but one point mentioned by more than one person was that there were still many people in their clubs who didn't know what APHIS was about. And, when they tried to present legislative reports to their clubs, they were often told to shorten them or they said that club members expressed no interest in legislation that would affect them.

I've heard these same complaints from legislative liaisons with parent clubs, specialty clubs, and local kennel clubs. There are a lot of good legislative liaisons working their tails off, to put it bluntly, trying to keep club members informed about important issues that affect dogs and dog breeding, and a lot of people don't want to hear about the issues. Unless animal control is actually at the door, ready to take their dogs, they aren't interested. When things reach that point, it's usually too late for a legislative liaison to help you. You're just a story on the Internet then, and a lot of people still won't believe it can happen to them. Many dog people will conclude that you must have done something to deserve what happened to you instead of understanding that we have serious problems with dog laws right now and we all need to be paying attention to what's going on.

I hate to compare the situation to the Titanic, but if someone is conducting a lifeboat drill, you would be well-advised to pay attention.

APHIS Proposed Changes
The most important issue for all of us who breed dogs at the moment is the proposed changes to the APHIS rules. Under the proposed changes, anyone who has more than four “breeding females” will have to be USDA licensed and allow unannounced inspections of their facilities. You can be exempt from USDA-licensure if each puppy is sold “face to face.” That means for each puppy sold, the buyer has to make at least one visit to your home to see it, either at the time of purchase or sometime before the purchase. However, if you ship even one puppy to a buyer without the buyer visiting your premises, you would loose your exemption.

You can be exempt if you have four or fewer breeding females. However, you cannot sell any puppies or dogs that were not born on your premises. So, if you get a puppy back from a bitch or a stud fee puppy, you can't sell it. If you buy a show prospect and it doesn't work out, you cannot sell him. If you do any of these things, you would lose your exemptions and have to become USDA licensed.

It's also very important for people to realize that co-owned bitches DO count toward their total number of breeding females. If you take in an occasional bitch as a rescue, she counts, even if you get her spayed later. Do you have bitches come in to visit your stud dog? They count. Also, if you have three bitches and three intact cats, for example, you are also over the limit. “Breeding females” is not restricted to dogs. It refers to any of the species covered under the APHIS regulations, such as rabbits, guinea pigs, and others. It doesn't matter that you never intend to breed these animals. If you have them, they count toward your total number of “breeding females.” If they are intact females on your premises, or you have an ownership interest in them, they count.

USDA-Compliant Facilities
One of the worst and most contentious changes for hobby breeders would affect all of their dogs, not just how they sell puppies. It goes to the heart of hobby dog breeding and how we love and care for our dogs. It concerns kennels vs. keeping dogs in the home.

USDA licensed breeders are required to keep their dogs in primary enclosures that meet the following requirements (Code of Federal Regulations, Title 9 - Animals and Animal ProductsVolume: 1 Date: 2009-01-01Original Date: 2009-01-01Title: SUBCHAPTER A - ANIMAL WELFARE Context: Title 9 - Animals and Animal Products.)
§ 3.6
Primary enclosures.

            Primary enclosures for dogs and cats must meet the following minimum requirements:
            (a) General requirements. (1) Primary enclosures must be designed and constructed of suitable materials so that they are structurally sound. The primary enclosures must be kept in good repair.
            (2) Primary enclosures must be constructed and maintained so that they:
            (i) Have no sharp points or edges that could injure the dogs and cats;
            (ii) Protect the dogs and cats from injury;
            (iii) Contain the dogs and cats securely;
            (iv) Keep other animals from entering the enclosure;
            (v) Enable the dogs and cats to remain dry and clean;
            (vi) Provide shelter and protection from extreme temperatures and weather conditions that may be uncomfortable or hazardous to all the dogs and cats;
            (vii) Provide sufficient shade to shelter all the dogs and cats housed in the primary enclosure at one time;
            (viii) Provide all the dogs and cats with easy and convenient access to clean food and water;
            (ix) Enable all surfaces in contact with the dogs and cats to be readily cleaned and sanitized in accordance with § 3.11(b) of this subpart, or be replaceable when worn or soiled;
            (x) Have floors that are constructed in a manner that protects the dogs' and cats' feet and legs from injury, and that, if of mesh or slatted construction, do not allow the dogs' and cats' feet to pass through any openings in the floor;
            (xi) Provide sufficient space to allow each dog and cat to turn about freely, to stand, sit, and lie in a comfortable, normal position, and to walk in a normal manner; and
            (xii) Primary enclosures constructed on or after February 20, 1998 and floors replaced on or after that date, must comply with the requirements in this paragraph (a)(2). On or after January 21, 2000, all primary enclosures must be in compliance with the requirements in this paragraph (a)(2). If the suspended floor of a primary enclosure is constructed of metal strands, the strands must either be greater than 1/8 of an inch in diameter (9 gauge) or coated with a material such as plastic or fiberglass. The suspended floor of any primary enclosure must be strong enough so that the floor does not sag or bend between the structural supports.
            (b) Additional requirements for cats.—(1)Space. Each cat, including weaned kittens, that is housed in any primary enclosure must be provided minimum vertical space and floor space as follows:
            (i) Prior to February 15, 1994 each cat housed in any primary enclosure shall be provided a minimum of 21/2 square feet of floor space;
            (ii) On and after February 15, 1994:
            (A) Each primary enclosure housing cats must be at least 24 in. high (60.96 cm);
            (B) Cats up to and including 8.8 lbs (4 kg) must be provided with at least 3.0 ft2 (0.28 m2);
            (C) Cats over 8.8 lbs (4 kg) must be provided with at least 4.0 ft2 (0.37 m2);
            (iii) Each queen with nursing kittens must be provided with an additional amount of floor space, based on her breed and behavioral characteristics, and in accordance with generally accepted husbandry practices. If the additional amount of floor space for each nursing kitten is equivalent to less than 5 percent of the minimum requirement for the queen, such housing must be approved by the attending veterinarian in the case of a research facility, and, in the case of dealers and exhibitors, such housing must be approved by the Administrator; and
            (iv) The minimum floor space required by this section is exclusive of any food or water pans. The litter pan may be considered part of the floor space if properly cleaned and sanitized.
            (2) Compatibility. All cats housed in the same primary enclosure must be compatible, as determined by observation. Not more than 12 adult nonconditioned cats may be housed in the same primary enclosure. Queens in heat may not be housed in the same primary enclosure with sexually mature males, except for breeding. Except when maintained in breeding colonies, queens with litters may not be housed in the same primary enclosure with other adult cats, and kittens under 4 months of age may not be housed in the same primary enclosure with adult cats, other than the dam or foster dam. Cats with a vicious or aggressive disposition must be housed separately.
            (3) Litter. In all primary enclosures, a receptacle containing sufficient clean litter must be provided to contain excreta and body wastes.
            (4) Resting surfaces. Each primary enclosure housing cats must contain a resting surface or surfaces that, in the aggregate, are large enough to hold all the occupants of the primary enclosure at the same time comfortably. The resting surfaces must be elevated, impervious to moisture, and be able to be easily cleaned and sanitized, or easily replaced when soiled or worn. Low resting surfaces that do not allow the space under them to be comfortably occupied by the animal will be counted as part of the floor space.
            (5) Cats in mobile or traveling shows or acts. Cats that are part of a mobile or traveling show or act may be kept, while the show or act is traveling from one temporary location to another, in transport containers that comply with all requirements of § 3.14 of this subpart other than the marking requirements in § 3.14(a)(6) of this subpart. When the show or act is not traveling, the cats must be placed in primary enclosures that meet the minimum requirements of this section.
            (c) Additional requirements for dogs—(1) Space. (i) Each dog housed in a primary enclosure (including weaned puppies) must be provided a minimum amount of floor space, calculated as follows: Find the mathematical square of the sum of the length of the dog in inches (measured from the tip of its nose to the base of its tail) plus 6 inches; then divide the product by 144. The calculation is: (length of dog in inches + 6) × (length of dog in inches + 6) = required floor space in square inches. Required floor space in inches/144 = required floor space in square feet.

            (ii) Each bitch with nursing puppies must be provided with an additional amount of floor space, based on her breed and behavioral characteristics, and in accordance with generally accepted husbandry practices as determined by the attending veterinarian. If the additional amount of floor space for each nursing puppy is less than 5 percent of the minimum requirement for the bitch, such housing must be approved by the attending veterinarian in the case of a research facility, and, in the case of dealers and exhibitors, such housing must be approved by the Administrator.

            (iii) The interior height of a primary enclosure must be at least 6 inches higher than the head of the tallest dog in the enclosure when it is in a normal standing position: Provided That, prior to February 15, 1994, each dog must be able to stand in a comfortable normal position.
            (2) Compatibility. All dogs housed in the same primary enclosure must be compatible, as determined by observation. Not more than 12 adult nonconditioned dogs may be housed in the same primary enclosure. Bitches in heat may not be housed in the same primary enclosure with sexually mature males, except for breeding. Except when maintained in breeding colonies, bitches with litters may not be housed in the same primary enclosure with other adult dogs, and puppies under 4 months of age may not be housed in the same primary enclosure with adult dogs, other than the dam or foster dam. Dogs with a vicious or aggressive disposition must be housed separately.
            (3) Dogs in mobile or traveling shows or acts. Dogs that are part of a mobile or traveling show or act may be kept, while the show or act is traveling from one temporary location to another, in transport containers that comply with all requirements of § 3.14 of this subpart other than the marking requirements in § 3.14(a)(6) of this subpart. When the show or act is not traveling, the dogs must be placed in primary enclosures that meet the minimum requirements of this section.
            (4) Prohibited means of primary enclosure. Permanent tethering of dogs is prohibited for use as primary enclosure. Temporary tethering of dogs is prohibited for use as primary enclosure unless approval is obtained from APHIS.
            (d) Innovative primary enclosures not precisely meeting the floor area and height requirements provided in paragraphs (b)(1) and (c)(1) of this section, but that provide the dogs or cats with a sufficient volume of space and the opportunity to express species-typical behavior, may be used at research facilities when approved by the Committee, and by dealers and exhibitors when approved by the Administrator.
            (Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0093)
            [56 FR 6486, Feb. 15, 1991, as amended at 62 FR 43275, Aug. 13, 1997; 63 FR 3023, Jan. 21, 1998; 63 FR 37482, July 13, 1998]
         
       
       
          Animal Health and Husbandry Standards
         
            § 3.7

            Compatible grouping.
            Dogs and cats that are housed in the same primary enclosure must be compatible, with the following restrictions:
            (a) Females in heat (estrus) may not be housed in the same primary enclosure with males, except for breeding purposes;
            (b) Any dog or cat exhibiting a vicious or overly aggressive disposition must be housed separately;
            (c) Puppies or kittens 4 months of age or less may not be housed in the same primary enclosure with adult dogs or cats other than their dams or foster dams, except when permanently maintained in breeding colonies;
            (d) Dogs or cats may not be housed in the same primary enclosure with any other species of animals, unless they are compatible; and
            (e) Dogs and cats that have or are suspected of having a contagious disease must be isolated from healthy animals in the colony, as directed by the attending veterinarian. When an entire group or room of dogs and cats is known to have or believed to be exposed to an infectious agent, the group may be kept intact during the process of diagnosis, treatment, and control.

(You can find more details about how to keep dogs under USDA licensing and the Animal Welfare Act at http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2009-title9-vol1/xml/CFR-2009-title9-vol1-chapI-subchapA.xml#seqnum3.2)

As you can see, these are very precise engineering standards which give instructions, down to the inch, of how dogs are to be kept. They are obviously designed for commercial breeders and people who breed dogs on a large scale for wholesale purposes. They are clearly not appropriate for hobby dog breeders and people who keep dogs in their home.

And, yet, when hobby breeders began objecting in large numbers in their APHIS comments that they could not and would not be able to keep their dogs under these conditions, APHIS issued the following response in a revised fact sheet (July 2012):

Q. If this proposal is adopted, would breeders who
come under regulation and allow their dogs to
roam free in their homes have to put their animals
in a kennel?
A. No. The AWA regulations define a primary
enclosure broadly to mean any structure or device
used to restrict an animal or animals to a limited
amount of space. As such, a home can be considered
a dog’s primary enclosure. If a room of a house is used
as a dog’s primary enclosure (e.g., a whelping room or
nursery), APHIS will apply the applicable regulations
and standards to the room.
If, however, a dog breeder allows their dogs to have
free run of the entire house, APHIS will assess whether
the home can house animals within the health and
humane standards contemplated by the AWA. If the
breeder has a kennel or cages that the dogs can stay
in inside the home that meet AWA standards, we would
consider that compliance with the primary enclosure
requirements has been achieved.

Can anyone see how you could possibly keep your dogs in the house and follow APHIS regulations? I can't. And neither can anyone we've checked with on this issue. That includes people who have been involved with commercial dog breeders and the USDA for decades. Dr. Gerald Rushin of the USDA claims that the USDA is currently inspecting some USDA dog breeders who raise dogs in their home but it's hard to see how they do it. They certainly can't have any kind of normal home if they do. It might be possible to meet the requirements listed above if you had a Toy breed and kept the dogs confined to one room, in small crates. You would have to be able to have extremely large crates for the little dogs, much larger than we normally use for dogs for crating purposes (for safety, for sleeping, for potty training purposes, for traveling). The room and all its contents would have to be capable of withstanding sterilization on a regular basis and be able to pass all of the other inspection points. But this is hardly the same as allowing your dogs to roam freely in the house. And it would seem to be impossible to provide this kind of situation for larger dogs. The cost alone of providing super size crates for large dogs would be prohibitive as they would probably have to be custom-made, and no one would want to keep their dogs confined to a crate in the home continually in this manner.

It's ludicrous that APHIS would try to provide this kind of answer to the critical comments they have been receiving from hobby breeders about putting their house dogs in kennels. Not just ludicrous. It appears to be an attempt to deceive. They appear to be trying to allay breeder criticism to try to get us to go along with the proposed changes. But I don't think any of us want to keep our dogs in the house under these conditions! APHIS needs to get some comments on this issue.

There are other items in the fact sheet which are questionable. The fact sheet claims that breeders will be able to meet buyers off their premises to make a sale instead of requiring a face to face meeting. However, this is not in the proposed rules. Call me skeptical, but it's what's in the rules that matter, not what's in some non-binding fact sheet. If an inspector comes to your home, they will follow the rules and regulations. They won't care what was promised in a fact sheet. And the fact sheet doesn't improve anything for breeders who need to ship a puppy occasionally.

I could go on but you see the problems. Please make sure that everyone in your clubs knows what is in the proposed APHIS changes. They would affect ALL of us. You have until August 15 to comment. Go to http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=APHIS-2011-0003-0001http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=APHIS-2011-0003-0001. You can make a comment of 2000 characters (not words). If you need more space you can attach a document such as a PDF or Word document. It's best to have your comment pre-written so you can simply copy and paste it into the text window.

The proposed APHIS changes would be a disaster for hobby dog breeders. Tell everyone you know and get them to comment!

Monday, July 30, 2012

APHIS Redux


The following article originally appeared in the July 20, 2012 issue of Dog News. It is posted here by permission of the author.

APHIS Redux
Carlotta Cooper

Many of you have been closely following the APHIS rulemaking process since it was announced on May 15. For those of you who haven't been, and just to catch everyone up, here is where we currently stand.

At almost the 11th hour on the Friday before the Monday, July 16th deadline for comments, APHIS extended the deadline until August 15. We now how a few more weeks to make persuasive arguments that this wrongheaded effort to regulate breeders should be scrapped. You can make comments directly to the APHIS site through this link.

The Sportsmen's and Animal Owners' Voting Alliance is putting together an opposition list to the proposed APHIS rules. They will be sending this list to Washington DC when their lobbyist meets with congressmen at the end of the month. The deadline to add your club, state organization, business, or self to this list is July 30. You can be added to this list by sending a brief message of opposition signed by an officer of your organization to Susan Wolf at cubhill@earthlink.net. Scores of parent clubs and kennel clubs have already signed. <http://www.saova.org/APHIS_Opposition.List.html> If APHIS will not listen to breeders, perhaps pressure from Congress will do some good. Each of these clubs represents dozens, even hundreds of people who vote, something that legislators care about, even if APHIS doesn't.

The AKC's petition to oppose the APHIS rules is still active, as of this writing, and has about 66,000 signatures. Isn't that amazing! The petition was to close on July 15 so it could be delivered to APHIS prior to the end of comments. I don't know how long it will remain open now that the comment period has been extended, but if you haven't signed it, please do. <http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/join-with-the-akc-to-protect-responsible-small-breeders.html> The petition will only count as one comment to APHIS, but it is a powerful indicator of the unity of AKC's breeders, buyer's, and supporters. The petition DOES make a difference. HSUS is also collecting signatures on petitions and we need to show that we have numbers, too.

The AKC has been attacked directly by HSUS on several occasions during this rulemaking process and on each occasion they have responded in a strong, dignified manner. They have shown that they are, and WE are, the experts when it comes to knowing and caring for dogs. HSUS has stooped to sending a troop of Girl Scouts from Maryland to the office of the Secretary of Agriculture and having the girls send a letter to the AKC claiming that the “AKC is mean to puppies” in order to try to get the AKC to change their opposition to the rules. As the AKC explained, “one-size-fits-all” rules are not in the best interest of dogs. AKC has a routine inspection program in place and they have inspected more than 55,000 kennels that register AKC dogs since 2000. No other registry has such a program, and they enhanced their Care and Conditions of Dogs policy at the recent April board meeting. If or when inspectors find signs of cruelty, the situation is reported to the proper local, state, and/or federal authorities, as they should be. Through the Canine Health Foundation, Companion Animal Recovery, and parent club and other rescue programs, the AKC is the leader in caring for dogs. In terms of animal welfare, the AKC does more for dogs than any other organization in the United States, bar none.

That hasn't stopped HSUS from attacking and lying online. They are also lying in the media about the proposed APHIS rules and what their impact would be. (I have a blog for Tennessee pet laws and I know that HSUS people have been trying to post messages about the proposed rules which are flatly inaccurate and misleading. Those messages are moderated and never posted. Likewise, they have not been posted by others with pet law blogs.) HSUS shills are out in force trying to tell the public and others that you can keep dogs in your home under the proposed rules, for instance. This is based on something that was written in the revised fact sheet that was posted by APHIS a few weeks ago in which they stated that your home could be considered your “primary enclosure.” Pardon me while I laugh here. The only way that your home could be considered your “primary enclosure” under the APHIS-AWA regulations is if you set aside a basement or some other room in your house that can be sterilized to 180 degrees and which has no sharp edges anywhere. (Can you sterilize your carpets? Hose down your hardwood floors? Do you have Venetian blinds in your rooms?) Any room your dogs inhabit would be subject to unannounced USDA inspections. If you raise puppies in your bedroom, you would have APHIS inspectors in there. So, if you want to live in a kennel and have unannounced visits from government inspectors, then sure, I guess these rules won't bother you at all. Don't believe anything posted by these HSUS mouthpieces who are just trying to get into your home and stop all dog breeding.

Currently there are about 9000 comments on the APHIS site and there are more comments opposed to the APHIS proposed rules than for them. The comments opposed to the rules are also of much better quality. Many of the comments in favor of the rules read like, “I hate puppy mills! I support these rules.” And “Shame on the AKC.” There are many “Me, too” type comments and they aren't very smart. They do not show any familiarity with what is actually in the proposed rules. However, HSUS claims that they have another 100,000 comments to deliver. Whether you believe that or not, and whether they are any better than the comments in favor of the rules so far, is anyone's guess.

Comments from breeders, parent clubs, and others opposing the rules have been excellent, for the most part. They show a much deeper understanding of the proposed rules and how they would impact breeders and their dogs. But more comments are needed, so please continue to post. You have until August 15. No one knows what it will take to make APHIS drop these rules, or if that is possible, but we need to keep writing.

If you have questions about the proposed rules there are many good places to look online for more information. You can check the AKC resource page: http://www.akc.org/governmentrelations/usda_aphis.cfm

SAOVA has an entire page of information: <http://www.saova.org/APHIS_rulemaking.html> with links.


And there are many good articles and blog posts online.

Please keep writing. If these proposed rules are passed, our rarer breeds could disappear and the quality of the remaining breeds will be seriously hurt. We need to stop these rules.





Thursday, July 12, 2012

APHIS Deadlines! Write Your Comments NOW!

This is a last call to stand up and be counted against the incredibly misbegotten APHIS rules for selling pet animals.  The final deadline for individual comments is MONDAY, July 16; the deadline for SAOVA opposition list signatures is July 30; and the deadline for AKC petition signatures is July  15.
Please note that the Irish Wolfhound Club of America, the Potomac
Valley Irish Wolfhound Club, the Irish Wolfhound Association of the
West Coast, the Irish Wolfhound Club of Puget Sound, and the Northern California Irish Wolfhound club have joined the SAOVA list of organizations opposed to the proposed APHIS rules.

Thank you, Christina Kallay, Harley Blanchard, Lori Walker, Chris Thompson,and Pat Cobb.  Thank you, also, to A. Nelson Sills and his Labrador Retriever Club  (their parent club).

The SAOVA opposition list is important because it is going to Congress to enlist Congress's help in getting rid of those destructive APHIS proposed rules.  Each organization listed represents multiple people, i.e., multiple voters, in some cases many hundreds or even thousands of voters.  Bureaucrats, such as those who run the USDA and its APHIS division, tend to ignore voters.  Senators and congressmen (and women) do not.

More clubs, whether IW clubs or other clubs to which any of you belong, putting their names on the SAOVA opposition list will drive that many nails into the APHIS rules coffin.

This is the link for the opposition list.  Just send a brief statement of opposition to the APHIS rules to:  Susan Wolf, cubhill@earthlink.net.  Give her the full name of your club or other organization and your address (only for verification purposes, it won't be on that list).


Then, read Susan's excellent letter to Congress explaining why the proposed APHIS rules are so destructive to all of us as owners and breeders.


You cannot copy any part of the letter, but you can use its ideas as the basis of your own comments to APHIS.


On this page is APHIS own summary of the proposed rules and other relevant information.  If you don't feel like re-reading all of that again, click onto:  "Comment Now"  at the top right-hand corner of the page.  That will take you to:


There, you follow the prompt and submit your comment.  You have a limit of 2000 characters and 20 minutes, but you'll get a warning just before the 20 minutes is up, and you can press that link for more time.  You can comment as many times as you want, but you have to re-submit your name and other identification for each comment.

Finally, here is the link for AKC's petition for individuals to sign that will be sent to APHIS.  It's good and will be sent with AKC's official comments, but the more effective measures are your own individual comments on the APHIS site and your club's name (or even your own business name) on the SAOVA opposition list.

Remember, the deadline is July  15.  Everything must be in by midnight, July 15.
--Roberta Pliner

Tuesday, July 10, 2012

Updated OPPOSITION LIST TO APHIS PROPOSED PET REGULATION


The clubs and organizations continue to line up in opposition to the APHIS proposed rule changes that would require small hobby breeders to be regulated the same way as large commercial breeders. These groups represent tens of thousands of dedicated animal breeders, people who have devoted their lives to breeding good dogs, cats, rabbits, and other pets. You only have a week left to make a comment on the APHIS site and tell them that you oppose this proposed change.


OPPOSITION LIST TO APHIS PROPOSED PET REGULATION


Urge Congress to take action to help American pet breeders stop APHIS from regulating us out of existence. To add your organization's name to the SAOVA Opposition List send an email signed by an officer of the organization to: Susan Wolf cubhill@earthlink.net. Please include organization's address.
NATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS
Alaskan Malamute Club of America
American Brittany Club
American Chinese Crested Club, Inc.
American Dog Breeders Association Inc.
American Dog Owners Association
American Game Fowl Association
American Herding Breed Association
American Kennel Club
American Rottweiler Club
American Shetland Sheepdog Association
American Whippet Club
Australian Shepherd Club of America
Borzoi Club of America, Inc.
Bull Terrier Club Of America
Cardigan Welsh Corgi Club of America
Dachshund Club of America
Endangered Breeds Association
English Shepherd Club
English Springer Spaniel Field Trial Association (ESSFTA)
Field Spaniel Society of America
German Shepherd Dog Club of America
International Havana Brown Society (IHBS)
Irish Terrier Club of America
Irish Wolfhound Club of America
Keeshond Club of America
Labrador Retriever Club
LaPerm Fanciers International
Miniature Australian Shepherd Club of America
National Cockatiel Society
North American Teckel Club
Oriental Shorthairs of America, Inc.
Peruvian Inca Orchid Enthusiasts Club
Show Rabbit Protection Society
Sportsmen's & Animal Owners' Voting Alliance (SAOVA)
The Cavalry Group
The International Cat Association (TICA)
The International Society of Silken Windhounds (ISWS)
United Kennel Club
United States Working Dog Foundation
Working Australian Shepherd Association

REGIONAL ORGANIZATIONS
Americans In Paradise
California Silver Fanciers (CFA)
Fox River Field Spaniel Club
Greater Twin Cities Borzoi Club
Irish Wolfhound Association of the West Coast
Lhasa Apso Southern Rescue, Inc.
North Carolina Cavy Breeders Association (NCCBA)
Northeast Beagle Gundog Federation
Northwest Silken Windhound Society (NWSWS) (regional club)
Orientals West (CFA)
Pennsylvania-New York Australian Shepherd Club
The Potomac Valley Irish Wolfound Club
Puget Sound Borzoi Club
TICA Mid Pacific Region (OR, Nor.Cal,. Nor. Nev. UT)
TICA South Central Region
TICA Southwest Region (S.California, Arizona, S.Nevada and Hawaii)
Wisconsin English Springer Spaniel Association, Inc.

STATE AND LOCAL ORGANIZATIONS
Agility Ability Club of IL
Alabama Canine Coalition (AL)
Alaska Australian Shepherd Club (AK)
Alaskan Malamute Club of Greater Houston (TX)
Albuquerque Whippet Fanciers Association (NM)
Alliance Of Responsible Pet Owners of Northeast Florida, Inc. (FL)
Animals in Our Care (AIOC) (IA)
Australian Shepherd Club of Michigan (MI)
Bakersfield Obedience Training Club (CA)
Barbary Coast Bull Terrier Club (CA)
Birmingham Kennel Club (AL)
Blue Ridge Shetland Sheepdog Club (VA)
Borzoi Club of Greater Omaha (NE)
Brandon Kennel Club of Mississippi (MS)
Cajun Country Ranch Animal Rescue Inc. (OK)
California Federation of Dog Clubs (CA)
California Responsible Pet Owners' Coalition (CaRPOC) (CA)
Carolina Australian Shepherd Club (NC)
Clarion Canine Obedience Club (PA)
Coatimondi Cat Club (AZ)
Colonial Rottweiler Club (MO)
Central Carolina English Setter Club (NC)
Cumberland Valley Dachshund Club (TN)
Doberman Pinscher Club of Greater Kansas City (KS)
Dog Federation of New York (NY)
Dog Federation of Wisconsin (WI)
Dogwood Rottweiler Club of Metropolitan Atlanta, Inc. (NC)
Eastex Australian Shepherd Club (TX)
Federation of Maine Dog Clubs, Inc. (ME)
Fort Bend Kennel Club (TX)
Georgia Canine Coalition Inc. (GA)
German Wirehaired Pointer Club of Southern California (CA)
Greater San Diego Whippet Association (CA)
Gtr Orange Park Dog Club, Inc. (FL)
Greater Twin Cities Whippet Club (MN)
Havana Brown Breed Rescue (MI)
Heart of New York Australian Shepherd Club (NY)
Hi Desert Australian Shepherd Club (CA)
Hoosier Rottweiler Club, Inc. (IN)
Hoosier State Chinese Shar Pei Club (IN)
Illinois Brittany Club (IL)
Illinois Championship Association (IL)
Imperial Polk Obedience Club of Lakeland FL
Indiana Beagler's and Sportsman's Alliance (IN)
Irish Wolfhound Club of Puget Sound (WA)
Interlocking Shetland Sheepdog club of Monee, Inc. (IL)
Jacksonville Sheltie Rescue Inc. (FL)
Jacksonville Shetland Sheepdog Club, Inc. (FL)
Kennel Club of Palm Springs (CA)
Kennel Club of Pasadena (CA)
Lone Star Airedale Terrier Club (TX)
Lone Star State American Pit Bull Terrier Club (TX)
Lone Star Borzoi Club (TX)
Maine Hunting & Sporting Dog Owners (ME)
Marion-Alachua Dog Training Association (FL)
MichTICAts (MI)
Medallion Rottweiler Club (IL)
Mid-Florida Shetland Sheepdog Club (FL)
Mid South ASC (TN)
Minnesota Council of Dog Clubs (MN)
Mississippi Canine Coalition, Inc. (MS)
Mississippi Dachshund Club, Inc. (MS)
Mississippi State Kennel Club (MS)
Missouri Federation of Animal Owners, Inc. (MO)
Moraine Tracking Club (IL)
Music City Bulldog Club (TN)
North Carolina Federation of Dog Clubs (NC)
North Carolina Responsible Animal Owners Alliance (NC)
North Carolina Sporting Dog Association (NC)
North Georgia Cockatiels (GA)
Northland Amateur Racing Club (MN)
Paws 4 Life, Inc. (TX)
Pet Breeders And Owners (OK)
Pfanciers United For Fun, Inc. (PUFF) CFA Affiliated club (MO)
Rand Park Dog Training Club (IL)
Red River Rascals Cat club (OK)
Responsible Pet Owners Alliance (TX)
RPOA Texas Outreach
Save Our Dogs (CA)
SC Agcom Co-Operative (SC)
Scottish Terrier Club of Greater Houston (TX)
Shenandoah Valley KC (VA)
Southern Colorado Australian Shepherd Club (C0)
Southern Oregon Racing and Coursing Assn. (OR)
Stonewall KC (VA)
Tehachapi Mountain Dog Fanciers (CA)
Tennessee Federation of Dog Clubs (TN)
Texas Gulf Coast American Staffordshire Terrier Club (TX)
Texas Working Dog Association of Greater Houston (TX)
The Australian Shepherd Club of Rogue Valley, Inc. (OR)
The Central Indiana Shetland Sheepdog Club (IN)
The Indiana Purebred Dog Alliance, Inc. (IN)
The Greater New York Rottweiler Club (NY)
The Irish Terrier Club of Southern California (CA)
The Poodle Club of Alabama, Inc. (AL)
The Shetland Sheepdog Club of Austin (TX)
TICA PartyCats Cat Club (GA)
Tri Star Kennel Club of Williamson County (TN)
Tullahoma Kennel Club of TN
Tupelo Kennel Club, Inc. (MS)
Valparaiso Kennel Club, Inc. (IN)
Vermont Federation of Dog Clubs (VT)
Vermont Traditions Coalition (VT)
Virginia Federation of Dog Clubs and Breeders (VA)
Weimaraner Club of the Washington DC Area (VA)
West Highland White Terrier Club of California (CA)
West Virginia Animal Owners Alliance (WV)
Western Massachusetts Shetland Sheepdog Club, Inc. (MA)

PROFESSIONALS, INDIVIDUALS
A+ Grooming and Training (NE)
A Piece Of Posh.com (VA)
Acapella Cattery (Havana Brown Cats) (MI)
Alysann Posner, President, Illinois Cocker Rescue (IL)
Bershar Oriental Shorthairs - registered in both CFA & TICA
Cailleach Australian Shepherds (NY)
Carson Dog Sports, LLC (NV)
ColoradoPixies Cattery (OK)
Concord Veterinary Services (VA)
Excalipurrs (TX)
Gattobello Savannahs
GONetwork (GA)
Happy Lil Pawz (TX)
HeartSong Australian Shepherds (MI)
Indrio LaPerms (TX)
Indrio Pedigrees (TX)
J-D Ranch. Carver Cutting Horses (TX)
JO-LU'S APBT Kennels (TX
Khazad Sighthounds (TX)
Maximum Aussies (TX)
Mazoe Rhodesian Ridgebacks (OR)
New Hope Kennel (IA)
OhMy Cattery of Oklahoma (OK)
Prispurr Maine Coons (NC)
Ranahan Stockdogs (CA)
Rice's Miniature Schnauzers (OH)
Roberta Pliner, Sookey's Place (NY)
Seminole-Brittanys, Ben & Jane Norris (VA)
Shade Tree Aussies (OK)
Shirley�s Cat House (TX)
Showdown Aussies (OH)
Slash V Australian Shepherds (TX)
Spot On Savannahs (VA)
Tails of Texas Cattery (TX)
TheDogPlace.org
TheDogPress.com
Three Dog Ranch, Inc. (MT)
VanCity Turkish Vans (WA)
Zephyr Working Kelpies (NV)





Help financially support SAOVA's successful pro-active advocacy! See Support SAOVA for options 
 

Wednesday, July 4, 2012

OPPOSITION LIST TO APHIS PROPOSED PET REGULATION


OPPOSITION LIST TO APHIS PROPOSED PET REGULATION


Urge Congress to take action to help American pet breeders stop APHIS from regulating us out of existence. To add your organization's name to the SAOVA Opposition List send an email signed by an officer of the organization to: Susan Wolf cubhill@earthlink.net. Please include organization's address.
NATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS
American Herding Breed Association
American Kennel Club
American Whippet Club
Endangered Breeds Association
Field Spaniel Society of America (parent club)
Sportsmen's & Animal Owners' Voting Alliance (SAOVA)
The International Cat Association (TICA)
United Kennel Club
United States Working Dog Foundation

REGIONAL AND STATE ORGANIZATIONS
Agility Ability Club of IL
Alabama Canine Coalition
Blue Ridge Shetland Sheepdog Club (VA)
California Responsible Pet Owners' Coalition (CaRPOC)
Central Carolina English Setter Club
Dog Federation of New York
Fox River Field Spaniel Club (regional club)
Lone Star State American Pit Bull Terrier Club (TX)
Minnesota Council of Dog Clubs
Mississippi Canine Coalition, Inc.
Moraine Tracking Club (IL)
North Carolina Federation of Dog Clubs
North Carolina Responsible Animal Owners Alliance
North Carolina Sporting Dog Association
North Georgia Cockatiels (GA)
Rand Park DTC (IL)
Responsible Pet Owners Alliance (TX)
RPOA Texas Outreach
Shenandoah Valley KC (VA)
Stonewall KC (VA)
Virginia Federation of Dog Clubs and Breeders





Help financially support SAOVA's successful pro-active advocacy! See Support SAOVA for options